Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Uruguayan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Uruguayans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 23.8% |
| Range | 19.7% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Uruguayans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |