Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Romanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Romanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Romanians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Romanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Romanian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.00% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 39.7% |
| Range | 19.7% | 38.7% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 8.7% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Romanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |