Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Icelander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Icelanders
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.060%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Icelander |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 16.5% |
| Range | 19.7% | 16.1% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Icelanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |