Ecuadorian vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Natives/Alaskans
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,698,915 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 67.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 13.7% |
| Range | 3.5% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 6.0% |
| Median | 2.3% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.67% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.66% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from India (2.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |