Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Hearing Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,698,915 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,917,145 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.776 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 1.4%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ecuadorian	Immigrants from Ecuador
Minimum	0.58%	0.57%
Maximum	4.1%	37.5%
Range	3.5%	36.9%
Mean	2.3%	3.2%
Median	2.3%	2.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	1.8%	2.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	2.7%	2.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.90%	0.59%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	0.67%	5.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.66%	5.2%

Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Ecuador by Hearing Disability

In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from India (2.5%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 0.55%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Hearing Disability
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 2.3%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Guyana	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 2.4%
Vietnamese	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 2.4%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	99.9 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 2.5%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	99.9 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 2.5%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	99.9 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 2.5%
Sierra Leoneans	99.9 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 2.5%
Ecuadorians	99.9 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 2.5%
Barbadians	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 2.5%
Immigrants \| West Indies	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 2.5%
Immigrants \| India	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 2.5%
Dominicans	99.8 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 2.5%
Thais	99.8 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 2.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 2.5%
Ghanaians	99.8 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 2.5%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.8 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 2.6%