Immigrants from Norway vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Natives/Alaskans
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 32.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 13.7% |
| Range | 19.1% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Median | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |