Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Natives/Alaskans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,536,031 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bulgaria and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.973 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 44.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bulgaria | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 0.89% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 13.7% |
| Range | 46.2% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 6.0% |
| Median | 3.1% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria are Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |