Ecuadorian vs South African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
South African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
South Africans
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs South African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,698,915 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 22.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | South African |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.31% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 27.3% |
| Range | 3.5% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 5.7% |
| Median | 2.3% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.67% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.66% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from India (2.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |