Chippewa vs Mexican Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
Mexican
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Mexicans
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Mexican Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,880,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 563,049,002 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%.

Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Mexican |
Minimum | 0.52% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 16.1% | 5.3% |
Range | 15.6% | 3.3% |
Mean | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.54% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 0.59% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 0.59% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Mexicans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Arapaho (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Yakama (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Japanese (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.6% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.6% |
Chippewa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.6% |
Arapaho | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.6% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Iran | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.7% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.7% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.7% |
Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.7% |
Yakama | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.7% |
Japanese | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.7% |