Chippewa vs Yakama Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Yakama
 Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Yakama
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Yakama Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,880,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,914,398 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Yakama | 
| Minimum | 0.52% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 16.1% | 6.2% | 
| Range | 15.6% | 4.9% | 
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.1% | 
| Median | 2.9% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Yakama by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Arapaho (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Mexican (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Laos (2.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability | 
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.6% | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.6% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.6% | 
| Chippewa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.6% | 
| Arapaho | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.6% | 
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Yakama | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Japanese | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.7% |