Chippewa vs Tsimshian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
Tsimshian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Tsimshian
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Tsimshian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,880,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,618,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.40%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 16.1% | 6.7% |
| Range | 15.6% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Tsimshian by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Arapaho (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Central America (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Liberia (2.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Albania | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Portuguese | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.7% |