Japanese vs Malaysian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Japanese
Malaysian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Japanese
Malaysians
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Malaysian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,332,708 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,243,890 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 0.19%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 60.0% |
| Range | 99.0% | 59.2% |
| Mean | 23.2% | 21.1% |
| Median | 20.5% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.2% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Malaysians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Panama (17.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
| Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
| Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
| German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |