Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,006,505 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.812. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.249% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 249.4 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.5%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $39,724, a difference of 5.9%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $47,911, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $62,230, a difference of 0.47%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $104,560, a difference of 0.83%), and median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $57,286, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.7%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.2%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.9%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.7%).