Norwegian vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Cuba
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Cuba
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,614,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,813,877 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.388 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 10.2%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Cuba |
Minimum | 0.30% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 9.2% | 9.8% |
Range | 8.9% | 8.8% |
Mean | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Median | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Cuba by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Luxembourger (4.3%, a difference of 3.4%), Czech (4.3%, a difference of 3.5%), Danish (4.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and German (4.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Belgian (4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Pennsylvania German (4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), European (4.6%, a difference of 0.48%), English (4.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Chinese (4.7%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |