Norwegian vs Chinese Unemployment
COMPARE
Norwegian
Chinese
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Norwegians
Chinese
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Chinese Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,614,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,790,103 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 10.9%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 9.2% | 15.0% |
| Range | 8.9% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 4.9% |
| Median | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Chinese by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Luxembourger (4.3%, a difference of 3.4%), Czech (4.3%, a difference of 3.5%), Danish (4.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and German (4.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovene (4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Venezuela (4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), European (4.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Scottish (4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |