Immigrants from Mexico vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Chickasaw
6.3%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,833,081 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 20.0% |
| Range | 29.9% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 7.2% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Central American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Ecuadorian (6.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Belizean (6.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (6.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 6.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |