Immigrants from Senegal vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Senegal
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Senegal
Chickasaw
6.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Senegal vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,121,254 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Senegal and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 18.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Senegal | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 11.0% | 20.0% |
| Range | 9.6% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Senegal by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Senegal are Salvadoran (6.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (6.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Chippewa (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Colville (6.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |