Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
6.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,551,926 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 19.3%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.90% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 15.5% | 20.0% |
Range | 14.6% | 18.2% |
Mean | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.0% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), West Indian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ute (6.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.1% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.1% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.1% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |