Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Chickasaw
7.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,282,461 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 40.7%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Dominican Republic | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 20.0% |
| Range | 15.1% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 6.1% |
| Median | 7.6% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Dominican (7.2%, a difference of 0.64%), Navajo (7.3%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), Menominee (7.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and Sioux (7.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |