Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
6.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,784,529 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 19.5%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 14.9% | 20.0% |
| Range | 12.5% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Haiti by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Haiti are Ute (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), West Indian (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Latin America (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |