Celtic vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
Bhutanese
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
Bhutanese
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,426,082 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,429,173 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.408 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 10.5% |
| Range | 19.0% | 9.9% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 4.6% |
| Median | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Bhutanese by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| German Russians | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.9% |