Filipino vs Bhutanese Unemployment
COMPARE
Filipino
Bhutanese
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Filipinos
Bhutanese
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Bhutanese Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,275,542 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,875,452 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 9.9% |
| Range | 7.7% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Bhutanese by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Yugoslavian (4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), French (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |