Portuguese vs Jordanian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Portuguese
Jordanian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Portuguese
Jordanians
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Jordanian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,338,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,957,171 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Jordanian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 50.5% |
Range | 42.1% | 48.6% |
Mean | 16.1% | 16.0% |
Median | 13.5% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Jordanians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), English (14.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Irish (14.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |