Hungarian vs South American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
South American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
South Americans
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs South American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,502,236 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 5.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | South American |
| Minimum | 6.0% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 46.7% |
| Range | 94.0% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 31.6% | 20.2% |
| Median | 22.7% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.8% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |