Welsh vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,858,131 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,071,275 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.51%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 5.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 97.0% | 56.7% |
| Mean | 19.2% | 13.4% |
| Median | 13.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Puget Sound Salish (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |