Turkish vs Immigrants from Latvia Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
 Immigrants from Latvia
 Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Latvia
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Latvia Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,119,330 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.96%.
 
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Latvia | 
| Minimum | 3.3% | 9.9% | 
| Maximum | 62.2% | 48.6% | 
| Range | 58.9% | 38.7% | 
| Mean | 18.2% | 17.7% | 
| Median | 13.8% | 14.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 22.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 11.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 10.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 10.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Latvia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93  | Exceptional 12.1%  | 
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 12.2%  |