Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Latvia Single Male Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,740,575 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,119,330 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 7.3%.

In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%).