Turkish vs Immigrants from Malaysia Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Malaysia
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Malaysia
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Malaysia Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,302,457 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.98%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Malaysia |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 7.3% |
| Maximum | 62.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.9% | 92.7% |
| Mean | 18.2% | 18.6% |
| Median | 13.8% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Malaysia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Venezuela (12.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Uruguayan (11.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Belgium (12.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Chilean (11.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |