Turkish vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Guamanian/Chamorro
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Guamanians/Chamorros
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,536,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.78%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 3.3% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 62.2% | 71.1% |
Range | 58.9% | 60.8% |
Mean | 18.2% | 25.1% |
Median | 13.8% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 29.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |