Immigrants from Yemen vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Chinese
16.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,158,341 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 53.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 32.4% | 57.9% |
| Range | 27.7% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 18.0% | 11.9% |
| Median | 18.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.72%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |