Ugandan vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Chinese
12.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,762,990 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 12.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 38.5% | 57.9% |
| Range | 36.1% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 11.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Portugal (12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Kenyan (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Kenyans | 93.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Pakistanis | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |