Cuban vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Chinese
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,594,477 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 14.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 57.9% |
| Range | 33.4% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.4% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |