Immigrants vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Chinese
12.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,345,123 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.501 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 15.2%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.4% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 57.9% |
Range | 21.8% | 56.4% |
Mean | 12.4% | 11.9% |
Median | 12.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Scotland (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Panama (12.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |
Vietnamese | 67.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.7% |
Latvians | 67.9 /100 | #157 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 64.9 /100 | #158 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 64.2 /100 | #159 | Good 12.7% |
Greeks | 64.1 /100 | #160 | Good 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |