Immigrants from Vietnam vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Vietnam
Chinese
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,378,073 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 19.5% | 56.4% |
Mean | 11.2% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam and Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |