Syrian vs Afghan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Syrian
Afghan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Syrians
Afghans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
63.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Afghan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,791,569 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,686,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Afghan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.91% |
| Maximum | 23.3% | 25.6% |
| Range | 22.3% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 9.5% |
| Median | 7.4% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Afghans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |