Subsaharan African vs Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Pima
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Pima
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 69.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Pima |
Minimum | 0.78% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.7% | 92.8% |
Mean | 15.6% | 29.5% |
Median | 11.1% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 34.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |