Subsaharan African vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Mexican American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Mexican American Indians
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,307,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 26.3% |
| Range | 61.7% | 24.9% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 13.1% |
| Median | 11.1% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Mexican American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |