Lithuanian vs Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Pima
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Pima
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 155.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Pima |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 7.2% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.6% | 92.8% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 29.5% |
| Median | 6.4% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |