South African vs Immigrants from China Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from China
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from China
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from China Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.97%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.3% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 26.5% |
Range | 53.2% | 23.5% |
Mean | 10.7% | 11.4% |
Median | 8.8% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from China by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |