South African vs Basque Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Basque
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Basques
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Basque Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,732,403 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Basque |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.59% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 36.5% |
Range | 53.2% | 35.9% |
Mean | 10.7% | 12.3% |
Median | 8.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Basques by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |