Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
18.6%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,393,443 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,159,389 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Chippewa |
Minimum | 16.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.5% | 97.9% |
Mean | 52.9% | 33.0% |
Median | 40.5% | 24.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.0% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.2% | 40.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 61.2% | 25.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.1% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Chippewa by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are French Canadian (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Micronesia (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ute (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |