Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
 Chippewa
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,366,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.090%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 0.89% | 0.77% | 
| Maximum | 39.6% | 8.4% | 
| Range | 38.7% | 7.6% | 
| Mean | 6.0% | 3.1% | 
| Median | 3.5% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Chippewa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Cape Verdean (2.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Cape Verdean (2.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 2.5%  |