Thai vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Thai
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Thais
Celtics
11.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,276,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 43.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Thai | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.97% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 38.0% | 70.9% |
| Range | 37.1% | 67.6% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 25.7% |
| Median | 7.2% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Thais by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 4.3%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
| Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
| Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
| Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |