Osage vs Sudanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
 Sudanese
 Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Sudanese
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Sudanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 3.0%.
 
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Sudanese | 
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 24.4% | 36.9% | 
| Range | 23.6% | 35.0% | 
| Mean | 10.3% | 11.5% | 
| Median | 9.8% | 9.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 7.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 7.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Osage and Sudanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty | 
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210  | Poor 9.6%  | 
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211  | Poor 9.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212  | Tragic 9.7%  | 
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213  | Tragic 9.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225  | Tragic 10.0%  | 
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226  | Tragic 10.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227  | Tragic 10.0%  | 
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228  | Tragic 10.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229  | Tragic 10.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230  | Tragic 10.0%  |