Moroccan vs Lithuanian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Lithuanian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Lithuanians
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Lithuanian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,150,693 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 9.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 6.1% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 57.6% |
| Range | 43.0% | 51.5% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 22.8% |
| Median | 20.6% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |