Moroccan vs Arapaho Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Arapaho
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Arapaho
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Arapaho Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,687,271 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396 and weighted average of 26.4%, a difference of 26.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 14.1% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 63.9% |
| Range | 43.0% | 49.8% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 35.9% |
| Median | 20.6% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 43.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 0.63%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |