Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Sudan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Immigrants from Sudan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Immigrants from Sudan
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Sudan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,946,491 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.65%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Immigrants from Sudan |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 38.5% |
| Range | 33.3% | 38.1% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 13.7% |
| Median | 13.8% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Immigrants from Sudan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |