Marshallese vs Immigrants from Sudan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
 Immigrants from Sudan
 Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Immigrants from Sudan
12.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Immigrants from Sudan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.485 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,946,491 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 3.2%.
 
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Immigrants from Sudan | 
| Minimum | 7.0% | 0.44% | 
| Maximum | 20.0% | 38.5% | 
| Range | 13.0% | 38.1% | 
| Mean | 13.5% | 13.7% | 
| Median | 12.5% | 12.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 9.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 16.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 7.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 7.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Immigrants from Sudan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Salvadoran (12.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Nicaraguan (12.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Fijian (12.6%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and Cuban (12.4%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty | 
| Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229  | Tragic 12.4%  | 
| Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230  | Tragic 12.5%  | 
| Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231  | Tragic 12.6%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232  | Tragic 12.6%  | 
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233  | Tragic 12.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234  | Tragic 12.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235  | Tragic 12.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236  | Tragic 12.7%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237  | Tragic 12.7%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238  | Tragic 12.7%  | 
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239  | Tragic 12.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240  | Tragic 12.7%  | 
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241  | Tragic 12.8%  | 
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242  | Tragic 12.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243  | Tragic 12.8%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244  | Tragic 12.8%  | 
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245  | Tragic 12.8%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246  | Tragic 12.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247  | Tragic 12.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248  | Tragic 12.9%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249  | Tragic 12.9%  |