Mexican American Indian vs Scottish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Scottish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Scottish
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Scottish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,490,793 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 24.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Scottish |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.3% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 21.6% |
| Median | 13.8% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 22.2% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |