Mexican American Indian vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Scotch-Irish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Scotch-Irish
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,595,685 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 17.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.3% | 96.8% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 20.1% |
| Median | 13.8% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |